Hillary's Course on Constituional Law

"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday called President Bush's explanations for eavesdropping on domestic telephone calls 'strange' and 'far-fetched,' launching a blistering attack on the White House ahead of the president's State of the Union address.

'Obviously, I support tracking down terrorists. I think that's our obligation. But I think it can be done in a lawful way," the New York Democrat said.' " According to the Associated Press.

Well, isn't that interesting. Hillary Clinton says that his explainations are "strange" and "far-fetched." And not only that she has the audacity to say that what President Bush is doing is illegal. Well, lets take a little look into Hillary's past. Does she have an explaination for posessing hundreds of FBI files of federal government workers; people who are NOT terrorists? Was that legal? I think not. Oh, but I forgot, democrats are always working for the common good so even if their actions not only intrude into innocent peoples' personal affairs and are illegal, it's ok.

And I have one last thing to say about this "scandal" inasmuch as it is getting quite tiresome. In the fourth ammendment of the constitution states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Well, lets look at the facts. President Bush has probable cause to put wiretaps on suspected terrorists. Also, phone conversations do not belong to the people. The phone a person talks to belongs to that person, but the phone lines belong to the phone company. This makes the conversations on the wires part of the public domain, therefore, giving the government the ability to listen to them without a warrant. But, the constitution doesn't really matter. Where is the ACLU?

Bush a spy? I think not.

There are many things troubling me about the world today, but my biggest pet-peeve as of now is how everyone on the left is claiming that President Bush is a spy and is overstepping his bounds as President. They are wrong. For some odd reason I seem to be the only person that I knows who remembers that thing that happened on September 11, 2001. What was that again? Oh, I remember, only 3000 Americans were killed by Islamic Radicals just for being American. Now, I'm not a fan of big brother, but if putting wire taps on possible terrorists prevents another 3000 or possibly more Americans dying by terrorism I am completly in favor of it. This is the problem with the Left and the ACLU, they are totlly selfish. Everything is about THEIR civil liberties and THEIR rights, how about the rights and civil liberties about the Americans who died on 9/11. Oh, I forgot. They dont matter because they arent you. Plus, we all know it is more important to ensure the civil liberties of one terrorist even if it means having thousands of people die, because civil liberties are what is most important. And, lest you forget, there have been how many terrorist attacks since 9/11? Zero. I trust President Bush to do what is right for our country and to prevent terroist attacks inasmuch as there have been no Americans killed on our own soil since 9/11.

I'm Back

Happy New Year to my few readers! I took a hiatus starting November 19, 2004 and now it is over, I am back and more concerned than ever. I stopped blogging because I was tired of news and took a break from current events and focused more on school and having fun, but I have become deeply troubled by everything going on in the world. I will try to write a new blog once a week though because I have a very busy schedule I may not have fun.

I hope that everyone has a happy and healthy 2006.

Mr. Right